Franchisors, Lawyers and State Regulators

Most people think that lawyers are crooks and some people think that franchising companies or franchisors are out to make a killing on poor unsuspecting franchisees. State regulators think that Franchisors are not good and lawyers are wonderful. But why? Well because they are lawyers of course. Yet in reality lets look at the situation here.

You see, Franchisors duties and responsibilites are to their team, their franchisees customers, extending brand. If the franchisor neglects such duties and responsibilities then they are short lived and they will go out of business. It is for this reason that the franchise system is inherently stable, viable and ethical. Whereas with lawyers and regulators are not and do not have the same inherent checks and balances.

When it comes to Franchisors, Lawyers and State Regulators it should be noted that Franchisors are entrepreneurial companies and therefore are the best of breed in economic commerce. Lawyers scrape the cream of wealth from the nation without any real worthy productivity. State Regulators put up roadblocks, barriers to entry and stifle free enterprise? So tell me, who are the good guys, who are the bad guys and why is calling Caesar to take care of these problems such a great idea? Consider this in 2006.

Lance Winslow, a retired entrepreneur, adventurer, modern day philosopher and perpetual tourist.